blob: 3b1369800c1e5d501dd06169f1c9dbbf6c67a030 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
|
// Copyright 2014 Citra Emulator Project
// Licensed under GPLv2 or any later version
// Refer to the license.txt file included.
#include "common/assert.h"
#include "common/logging/log.h"
#include "core/arm/arm_interface.h"
#include "core/core.h"
#include "core/hle/hle.h"
#include "core/hle/config_mem.h"
#include "core/hle/shared_page.h"
#include "core/hle/service/service.h"
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
namespace {
bool reschedule; ///< If true, immediately reschedules the CPU to a new thread
}
namespace HLE {
void Reschedule(const char *reason) {
DEBUG_ASSERT_MSG(reason != nullptr && strlen(reason) < 256, "Reschedule: Invalid or too long reason.");
// TODO(bunnei): It seems that games depend on some CPU execution time elapsing during HLE
// routines. This simulates that time by artificially advancing the number of CPU "ticks".
// The value was chosen empirically, it seems to work well enough for everything tested, but
// is likely not ideal. We should find a more accurate way to simulate timing with HLE.
Core::g_app_core->AddTicks(4000);
Core::g_app_core->PrepareReschedule();
reschedule = true;
}
bool RescheduleIsPending() {
return reschedule;
}
void DoneRescheduling() {
reschedule = false;
}
void Init() {
Service::Init();
reschedule = false;
LOG_DEBUG(Kernel, "initialized OK");
}
void Shutdown() {
Service::Shutdown();
LOG_DEBUG(Kernel, "shutdown OK");
}
} // namespace
|
